Score contribution per author:
α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count
It is conventional wisdom that transparency in cartels--monitoring of competitors' prices, sales, and profits--facilitates collusion. However, in several recent cases cartels have instead worked to preserve the privacy of their participants' actions and outcomes. Toward explaining this behavior, we show that cartels can sometimes sustain higher profits when actions and outcomes are observed only privately, because better information can hinder collusion by helping firms devise more profitable deviations from the collusive agreement. We provide conditions under which maintaining privacy is optimal for cartels that follow a market-segmentation strategy.