All School Finance Equalizations are Not Created Equal

S-Tier
Journal: Quarterly Journal of Economics
Year: 2001
Volume: 116
Issue: 4
Pages: 1189-1231

Score contribution per author:

8.043 = (α=2.01 / 1 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

School finance equalization has probably affected American schools more than any other reform of the last 30 years. Understanding it is a prerequisite for making optimal social investments in human capital. Yet, it is poorly understood. In this paper I explain why: it differs from conventional redistribution because it is based on property values, which are endogenous to schools' productivity, taste for education, and the school finance system itself. I characterize equalization schemes and show why some "level down" and others "level up." Schemes that strongly level down have unintended consequences: even poor districts can end up worse off. I also show how school finance equalization affects property prices, private school attendance, and student achievement.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:qjecon:v:116:y:2001:i:4:p:1189-1231.
Journal Field
General
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-02-02