Implications of a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) tax when substitutions to non-beverage items are considered

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Health Economics
Year: 2013
Volume: 32
Issue: 1
Pages: 219-239

Authors (6)

Finkelstein, Eric A. (not in RePEc) Zhen, Chen (University of Georgia) Bilger, Marcel (Duke-NUS Graduate Medical Scho...) Nonnemaker, James (not in RePEc) Farooqui, Assad M. (not in RePEc) Todd, Jessica E. (Government of the United State...)

Score contribution per author:

0.335 = (α=2.01 / 6 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Using the 2006 Homescan panel, we estimate the changes in energy, fat and sodium purchases resulting from a tax that increases the price of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) by 20% and the effect of such a tax on body weight. In addition to substitutions that may arise with other beverages, we account for substitutions between SSBs and 12 major food categories. Our main findings are that the tax would result in a decrease in store-bought energy of 24.3kcal per day per person, which would translate into an average weight loss of 1.6 pounds during the first year and a cumulated weight loss of 2.9 pounds in the long run. We do not find evidence of substitution to sugary foods and show that complementary foods could contribute to decreasing energy purchases. Despite their significantly lower price elasticity, the tax has a similar effect on calories for the largest purchasers of SSBs.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jhecon:v:32:y:2013:i:1:p:219-239
Journal Field
Health
Author Count
6
Added to Database
2026-01-24