PRIVATE ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT IN THE PRESENCE OF PRE‐TRIAL BARGAINING*

A-Tier
Journal: Journal of Industrial Economics
Year: 2009
Volume: 57
Issue: 3
Pages: 372-409

Score contribution per author:

1.341 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We study the effect of encouraging private actions for breaches of competition law. We develop a model of litigation and settlement with asymmetric information. We show that screening liable from non‐liable defendants requires the Court to restrict the rules governing admissible evidence. We study how to design the rules so as to enhance the role of private litigation in antitrust enforcement and prove that increasing damages is better than reducing costs of initiating suits. We also find large benefits from introducing a system of compensation for defendants found non‐liable, paid by unsuccessful plaintiffs.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:bla:jindec:v:57:y:2009:i:3:p:372-409
Journal Field
Industrial Organization
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-24