When are signals complements or substitutes?

A-Tier
Journal: Journal of Economic Theory
Year: 2013
Volume: 148
Issue: 1
Pages: 165-195

Score contribution per author:

1.341 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

The paper introduces a notion of complementarity (substitutability) of two signals which requires that in all decision problems each signal becomes more (less) valuable when the other signal becomes available. We provide a general characterization which relates complementarity and substitutability to a Blackwell comparison of two auxiliary signals. In a setting with a binary state space and binary signals, we find an explicit characterization that permits an intuitive interpretation of complementarity and substitutability. We demonstrate how these conditions extend to more general settings. We also illustrate the implications of our concepts for three economic applications: information disclosure in auctions, information aggregation through voting, and polarization of beliefs.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jetheo:v:148:y:2013:i:1:p:165-195
Journal Field
Theory
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-24