Grading on a curve: When having good peers is not good

B-Tier
Journal: Economics of Education Review
Year: 2019
Volume: 73
Issue: C

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Student access to education levels, tracks or majors is usually determined by their previous performance, measured either by internal exams, designed and graded by teachers in school, or external exams, designed and graded by central authorities. We say teachers grade on a curve whenever having better peers harms the evaluation obtained by a given student. We use rich administrative records from public schools in Catalonia to provide evidence that teachers indeed grade on a curve, leading to negative peer effects. This puts forth a source of distortion that may arise in any system that uses internal grades to compare students across schools and classes. We find suggestive evidence that school choice is impacted only the year when internal grades matter for future prospects.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:ecoedu:v:73:y:2019:i:c:s0272775718306174
Journal Field
Education
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25