What is good for the goose is good for the gander?

B-Tier
Journal: Economics of Education Review
Year: 2020
Volume: 75
Issue: C

Authors (3)

Boggio, Cecilia (not in RePEc) Coda Moscarola, Flavia (not in RePEc) Gallice, Andrea (Università degli Studi di Tori...)

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We conduct a field experiment with elementary school children to go to the roots of the gender gap in financial participation and decision-making. We study the combined effects of two treatments designed to boost the attention span of participants in completing a basic financial task. We find that the use of gender-specific conceptual frames (competitiveness vs. cooperation) in the description of the task: a) raises girls’ interest and thus increases their number of coherent answers; b) makes the transmission of information on the utility of savings more effective in boosting the coherence of girls’ answers; c) does not increase girls’ level of impatience. This evidence supports our underlying hypothesis that the use of more gender-specific conceptual frames in presenting financial information to women may play a role in narrowing the gender gap in financial market participation and decision-making.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:ecoedu:v:75:y:2020:i:c:s0272775719300378
Journal Field
Education
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25