Score contribution per author:
α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count
Consider a population of agents who choose one among a set of destinations located along a rectilinear road. Each of these destinations has a certain utility, modeled by a random variable. We compare a situation where the agents have to explore the destinations to observe the value of their utilities, to a situation where they know these values beforehand. We show that more information yields a higher welfare to the agents, and also, perhaps counter‐intuitively, higher distance traveled.