Is There a Hold‐up Problem?

B-Tier
Journal: Scandanavian Journal of Economics
Year: 2004
Volume: 106
Issue: 3
Pages: 475-494

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We report on a hold‐up experiment in which unilateral investment is followed by bilateral bargaining according to Nash’s demand game. Without communication, investment is low and coordination is poor. Unilateral communication facilitates coordination, but not perfectly. Successful coordination predominantly entails “fair” outcomes. Perhaps surprisingly, sellers (investors) do at least as well under buyer communication as under seller communication.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:bla:scandj:v:106:y:2004:i:3:p:475-494
Journal Field
General
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25