MONITORING OF WORKERS AND PRODUCT MARKET COMPETITION: THE ROLE OF WORKS COUNCILS

C-Tier
Journal: Economic Inquiry
Year: 2015
Volume: 53
Issue: 2
Pages: 1366-1379

Authors (2)

Oliver Gürtler (Universität zu Köln) Felix Höffler (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.503 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 0.5x C-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="ecin12182-abs-0001"> <p xml:id="ecin12182-para-0001">Often the consent of worker representations, such as works councils, is required before firms are allowed to install technologies that monitor workers' behavior. Absent monitoring, workers produce low output, while at the same time receiving an information rent. To gain the works council's consent to the installation of a monitoring technology, firms need to compensate workers for the lost information rent. Hence, by making it more costly to produce high output, works councils can serve firms as an instrument to commit to low output levels. This provides a rationale for why works council rights are not opposed more strongly by employers. (JEL D43, D86, J83, L13)

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:bla:ecinqu:v:53:y:2015:i:2:p:1366-1379
Journal Field
General
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25