Moral Hazard and Nonmarket Institutions: Dysfunctional Crowding Out or Peer Monitoring?

S-Tier
Journal: American Economic Review
Year: 1991
Volume: 81
Issue: 1
Pages: 179-90

Score contribution per author:

4.022 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

The authors examine a situation in which insurance is characterized by moral hazard. When market insurance is provided, supplementary mutual assistance between family and friends (unobservable to market insurers) will occur. When nonmarket insurers have no better information than market insurers, the mutual assistance not only crowds out market insurance, but is also harmful and, therefore, dysfunctional. Alternatively, when nonmarket insurers can observe each other's effort perfectly, mutual assistance is beneficial. These results point to the potential importance of peer-monitoring mechanisms in mitigating moral hazard. Copyright 1991 by American Economic Association.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:aea:aecrev:v:81:y:1991:i:1:p:179-90
Journal Field
General
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-24