Mandatory versus Discretionary Spending: The Status Quo Effect

S-Tier
Journal: American Economic Review
Year: 2014
Volume: 104
Issue: 10
Pages: 2941-74

Authors (3)

T. Renee Bowen (not in RePEc) Ying Chen (not in RePEc) H?lya Eraslan (Rice University)

Score contribution per author:

2.681 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Do mandatory spending programs such as Medicare improve efficiency? We analyze a model with two parties allocating a fixed budget to a public good and private transfers each period over an infinite horizon. We compare two institutions that differ in whether public good spending is discretionary or mandatory. We model mandatory spending as an endogenous status quo since it is enacted by law and remains in effect until changed. Mandatory programs result in higher public good spending; furthermore, they ex ante Pareto dominate discretionary programs when parties are patient, persistence of power is low, and polarization is low.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:aea:aecrev:v:104:y:2014:i:10:p:2941-74
Journal Field
General
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25