Accountability and Flexibility in Public Schools: Evidence from Boston's Charters And Pilots

S-Tier
Journal: Quarterly Journal of Economics
Year: 2011
Volume: 126
Issue: 2
Pages: 699-748

Authors (5)

Atila Abdulkadiroğlu (not in RePEc) Joshua D. Angrist (Massachusetts Institute of Tec...) Susan M. Dynarski (not in RePEc) Thomas J. Kane (not in RePEc) Parag A. Pathak (National Bureau of Economic Re...)

Score contribution per author:

1.609 = (α=2.01 / 5 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We use student assignment lotteries to estimate the effect of charter school attendance on student achievement in Boston. We also evaluate a related alternative, Boston's pilot schools. Pilot schools have some of the independence of charter schools but are in the Boston Public School district and are covered by some collective bargaining provisions. Lottery estimates show large and significant score gains for charter students in middle and high school. In contrast, lottery estimates for pilot school students are mostly small and insignificant, with some significant negative effects. Charter schools with binding assignment lotteries appear to generate larger gains than other charters. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:qjecon:v:126:y:2011:i:2:p:699-748
Journal Field
General
Author Count
5
Added to Database
2026-01-24